PLANS for a new housing development on the edge of Somerset’s smallest city have been refused for a second time.

Gladman Developments was refused outline permission in September 2020 to build up to 90 homes on Wookey Hill Road on the western edge of Wells, a short distance from St. Cuthbert’s Paper Mill.

The Congleton-based developer put forward amended plans in late July, reducing the number of homes down to 78 and providing additional public open space in the northern part of the site.

But Somerset Council has refused the plans for a second time, stating they would “erode the gap” between Wells and the neighbouring villages.

The site lies to the south of Wookey Hole Road, next to the Priory Fields development being delivered by Bovis Homes and a short distance from the Mendip Hills national landscape (formerly area of outstanding natural beauty, or AONB).

Of the 78 homes intended for the site, 32 would have been affordable – meeting the council’s target for 40 per cent affordable housing for any new development of ten homes or more within the former Mendip area.

“The scheme will create a well-balanced, sustainable extension to Wells, while maintaining separation between Wells and Haybridge,” according to developer claims.

But chief planning officer at Somerset Council, Alison Blom-Cooer outlined six reasons for refusing the ameded plan.

  • The development lies “outside the settlement limits” of Wells and is not allocated within either part of the Mendip Local Plan
  • The site would “erode the designated green gap” between the parish of Wells and the neighbouring Haybridge area (which lies in the neighbouring parish of St. Cuthbert Out)
  • The proposals would “negatively impact local identity and distinctiveness” through the loss of hedgerows and a prominent oak tree
  • The developer has not demonstrated how it would prevent any net increase in phosphates within the Somerset Levels and Moors Ramsar site
  • The developer has not ensured sufficient bat protection measures are in place, with surveys being “incomplete” and “inadequate”
  • The developer’s travel plan – showing how residents will access local amenities without relying on the private car – is “unsatisfactory” and “requires major revision”

Gladman has not indicated whether it intends to appeal this decision.

The developer secured outline permission in December 2023 to deliver 100 homes on the B3139 Elm Close elsewhere in the city, before selling the site on to David Wilson homes.